$theTitle=wp_title(" - ", false); if($theTitle != "") { ?>
By: Amy Ellsworth In: 2010 Family Philanthropy Conference| Family Philanthropy
3 Feb 2010Differing views, opinions, approaches and predictions for the future can lead to uncomfortable conversations within families. And, too often, the outcome is deadlock—at best.
According to Harvard lecturer, author and consultant Doug Stone, these conversations—where both parties truly believe they are right—will never be productive if we continue to talk to people “as if their head is an empty vessel and our talking will fill their brain.”
Stone suggests approaching these conversations differently: work to understand why the other person holds the beliefs they do. By asking unloaded questions (note: these are different from zingers with a question mark at the end), you can understand the belief gap that needs to be closed. In the process of doing so, you’re making the other person feel that they’re being heard—a powerful step in overcoming hurdles that too often derails progress.
Stone illustrated this point by comparing two different approaches when requesting organs from family members who are often just minutes past one of the most traumatic moments of their life.
There were too many stories and insights from this session (How to Have Difficult Conversations and Move On) to capture in a blog entry, so check out Doug’s Web site: http://www.diffcon.com to learn more.
Amy Zell Ellsworth is senior philanthropic advisor and New England International Donors (NEID) program manager at The Philanthropic Initiative.