philbuchananThe Data a Foundation Board Needs

By: Phil Buchanan In: 2010 Annual Conference

26 Apr 2010

What data does a foundation board member need to gauge foundation effectiveness? That was the question we grappled with at a trustee-CEO summit session Saturday at the Council on Foundations annual conference in Denver. Our session received invaluable help from the CEO and a trustee of a foundation that has pushed more than most: the Stuart Foundation in California.

Christy Pichel and Davis Campbell described how the Stuart Foundation has moved beyond the usual, easily available metrics to get a handle on effectiveness. For example, the foundation surveys its grantees regularly and looks at how it performs relative to other funders. The foundation learned that grantees valued deeply its program officers’ expertise—and wanted more of their time and help. The result was board approval of the hiring of additional staff.

In the area of child welfare, Stuart is seeking better life outcomes for foster youth in California but recognized that the state lacked an adequate data system. So the foundation made an investment that has led to the creation of a database that allows the foundation—as well as grantees and government officials—to track the efficacy of efforts to help foster youth establish lifelong connections with caring adults. Stuart Foundation can now monitor whether its child welfare strategy is working. (For more on this, see CEP’s case study on Stuart.)

Performance assessment for foundations is challenging (much more so than for businesses or operating nonprofits). And, as Christy and Davis noted, you can’t understand your effectiveness if you don’t have an articulated strategy. It’s tough work—as another California foundation CEO, Jim Canales of the James Irvine Foundation, has discussed on the CEP Blog in recent days.

But I wonder: Is there a more central board responsibility than assessing a foundation’s effectiveness? I am not sure there is. Let’s hope more and more foundation boards and CEOs follow the lead of funders like Irvine, Stuart, Wallace, RWJF, and others and vigorously push for the data that will enable them to answer that deceptively simple question: “How are we doing?”

Disclosure: CEP provides assessment tools and/or receives grant support from the foundations mentioned in this post.

Phil Buchanan is the president of the Center for Effective Philanthropy.

Comment Form


Welcome to RE: Philanthropy! In this blog, guest and Council bloggers share ideas and insights on the most pressing issues in philanthropy. If you want to contribute, please contact Sean Walsh at sean.walsh@cof.org

Contributors

Ray Knott
Suzanne E. Siskel
Mimi Goodwill
Carrie Varoquiers
Audrey Jacobs
Kristin Ivie
Susan Price
Kristin Lindsey
Barbara Dyer
Rodney McKenzie
Chatrane Birbal
Vicki Rosenberg
Ophelia Basgal
johnmorning
Fred Dedrick
Andrew Schulz
Ruby Takanishi
Sean Stannard-Stockton
Jim Harrell
Chet Tchozewski
Cheryl McKenna
Eliana Vera
Paul Major
Kevin R. Webb
Linda Raybin
Leslie Dunford
Ron Ancrum
Kathy Merchant
Bruce Trachtenberg
Deborah Hoover
Dan Rader
Adrienne Vargas
Hillary Nather-Detisch
Andrew Ho
Michelle Bermudez
Myrna Deckert, Anita DeFrantz, Amina Dickerson
Ali Webb
Brian Collier
Susan Meier
Rene Cabral-Daniels
Phil Buchanan
Will Heaton
Marco F. Cocito-Monoc
Roger Doughty
Darryl Lester
Jan Jaffe
Dien Yuen
Ira Strumwasser
Diane Miller
Diana Sieger