judypatrickA Candid Conversation about Change

By: Judy Patrick In: 2011 Annual Conference| Leadership| Philanthropy

7 Apr 2011

As I begin to reflect on this year’s conference theme, “Windows,” a metaphor for encouraging a spirit of transparency, honesty, openness and candor, I am moved to also reflect a bit about the past year.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the role of theories of change in our work. As we in foundations put increased emphasis on developing sophisticated theories of change and the hoped-for metrics they will make possible, I find myself asking: Who should really be determining these theories and what advances the common good? Who should own the theory of change?

As I watch our grant partners—smaller community-based organizations in low-income communities—trying to navigate this rapidly changing landscape in philanthropy, I observe them attempting to fit what they are doing into the theories of change of their funders. This often occurs at the expense of meeting the needs of their communities. In spite of frequent recommendations that giving general support grants most successfully builds the strengths and impact of nonprofits, they are receiving more and more restricted grants. I have had grant partners say to me that they are feeling increasingly like subcontractors who are fulfilling the needs of their funders.

In these situations, what happens to fulfilling the needs of communities? I think the current climate of increased emphasis on metrics is in fact weakening many nonprofits. After all, what are we actually seeking to measure? Social and systemic change work is very dependent upon strategic relationships. Yet, we rarely ask grant partners, or ourselves, to measure the quality and quantity of these relationships.

The result is that as grants become more restrictive, organizations have fewer resources to build their own infrastructure. They begin to focus their staff resources on meeting the “contract” requirements from their funder(s). When those grants end (as they inevitably will) those organizations often lose staff.

I don’t pretend to have the answers. This business of change, of moving the needle toward a more just world, is very complicated work. I do, however, believe that the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of delivering on foundations’ needs to fulfill their own metrics at the expense of metrics that are more central in the communities they wish to impact.

Over the next few days, as we talk about our work and the impact we seek to make, I invite you to join me in this conversation about change.

Judy Patrick is CEO and president of the Women’s Foundation of California

3 Responses to A Candid Conversation about Change

Delbert Mack

April 9th, 2011 at 9:26 pm

I read with interest the April 9, 2011 article in the Sacramento Bee by Judy Patrick re: Prison.
My wife and I have a Pen Pal at VSPW who has been there a number of years, now age 25. She calls herself a liffer”life without parole”.She is completely innocent of the crime charged being the driver of a vehicle from which a person got out of and shot and killed another person. She did not know the crime was to happen and is not a gang member. In prison she has learned to type reports for the officers while the sit idle, as she puts it. Getting an appeal has been futule. Instead of costing the State money she could be a productive person if released. Where is help available? Her family is destitute.

In the News: Judy Patrick on State Prison Reform and Change « Women's Foundation of California Blog

April 14th, 2011 at 5:20 pm

[...] I’ve been thinking a lot about the role of theories of change in our work. Read the rest of the article on the Re: Philanthropy blog [...]

Garold Faber

April 22nd, 2011 at 12:26 am

Sweden has one 10th per capita people in prison.Offenders are assign probation officers who see that they get a place to live, food , clothing.job training and give funding and close supervision.

Comment Form

Welcome to RE: Philanthropy! In this blog, guest and Council bloggers share ideas and insights on the most pressing issues in philanthropy. If you want to contribute, please contact webteam@cof.org.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Council on Foundations.


David Maurrasse
Sarita Venkat
Ashley Harper
Rhonda R. Mims
Cecilia Garcia
Novelette Peterkin
Vikki Spruill
John Padilla
Timothy P. Silard
Valerie Batts
John Feather
David Colby
Kay Guinane
Marco F. Cocito-Monoc
Sam Davis
Kate Nielsen
Debra Rubino
Ana Marie Argilagos
Nina Smart
John Porter
Ken Sternad
Jenny Hodgson
Richard Ober
Nicole Lewis
Cris Stainbrook
Brian Reich
Rich Westfall
Heidi Sytsema
Robert K. Ross
Doug Balfour
Carol Goss
Hallie Preskill Mayur Patel and Charles Gasper
Brian Collier
Tony Macklin
Elizabeth Carrott Minnigh
Lee Rainie
Kathy Merchant
Elizabeth Ramirez
Diane Miller
Kathryn Merchant
David Matthew
Susan Beaudry
Susan Barry
Holly Welch Stubbing
Shanee Helfer
Judy Tenzer
Jack A. Calhoun
Robert Weaver