Judy SneathIs Outcomes-Driven Philanthropy Affecting Creativity?

By: Judy Sneath In: Media and Technology| Nonprofits| Philanthropy

16 May 2012

“The movement towards outcomes-driven philanthropy has done a lot to diminish creativity,” concluded one CEO at a recent GMA Foundations’ NPO Conversation on creativity. At this regular lunchtime forum, leaders of seven Boston-area nonprofits were asked to open up about their organization’s most creative moments, their innovation wish list for 2012, and obstacles to organizational creativity. Judging by the conversation, creativity and innovation are still essential to the daily existence of these organizations. The question, though, remains: Is outcomes-driven philanthropy affecting creativity?

The nonprofit sector frequently serves as the creative sector for a better world. Nonprofit organizations are ideally positioned to study problems, frame creative solutions, and develop models for scaling. Indeed, creative uses of technology have transformed the way most of these nonprofits connect with new audiences, expand their networks, and reach new donors.

  • The Roxbury International Film Festival partnered with Los Angeles-based Pan African Film Festival to do a simultaneous screening on both coasts, with director, producer, and actor Mario Van Peebles speaking to the Boston audience via Skype.
  • The Discovery Museum is expanding its programming for young children outside of its building in Acton and into a network of family day care centers in Lowell and the homes of children on the autism spectrum across the region.
  • Jumpstart and JFYNetWorks have used technology to train exponentially larger numbers of teachers in techniques for reaching early childhood and at-risk adolescent learners.

Technology remains high on all the leaders’ wish lists as they seek creative, scalable models for change.

At a time when creativity and innovation are seen as essential to competing globally and to solving some of our most difficult social issues, the quality of this country’s education is increasingly measured by standardized test scores. Similarly, philanthropy is measured more and more by outcomes data.

Data certainly can drive great decisions. However, relying solely on data might rule out untested innovation. For obvious reasons, donors don’t want to fund failure, yet great achievements in science, technology, and the arts would not have been possible without experiencing failure first.  Solutions often lie in extensive trial and error and in daring action.

Are creativity and innovation present in your plans for 2012?

Judy Sneath is communications officer at GMA Foundation, a member of the Council on Foundations.

1 Response to Is Outcomes-Driven Philanthropy Affecting Creativity?

Susan Ashe

May 16th, 2012 at 3:11 pm

Great observations, Ms. Sneath. I intend to share with our Board of Directors.

Comment Form

Welcome to RE: Philanthropy! In this blog, guest and Council bloggers share ideas and insights on the most pressing issues in philanthropy. If you want to contribute, please contact webteam@cof.org.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Council on Foundations.


Vikki Spruill
Kim Embretson and Tom McSparron
Mary McClymont
Meghan Duffy
Kate Ahern
Lorrie Fair
Evelyn Gibson
Joshua Gibb
Lisa Jordan
Victoria Dunning
Allison Sole
Aleesha Towns-Bain
Nicole Lewis
Kathy Merchant
Kristen Grimm
William Vesneski
Heather Lord
Joop Rubens
David Maurrasse
Erica V. Ekwurzel
Mark Neithercut
Carol Goss
Trabian Shorters
Michael Bzdak
Ira Strumwasser, Ph.D.
Jim Mayfield
Michelle Bermudez
Salin Geevarghese
Diana Sieger
Caroline Altman Smith
Brooke Bailey
Stephanie Hyre
Kristin Ivie
Darren Sandow
Eileen Ellsworth
Elizabeth Ramirez
Will Heaton
Mae Hong
Todd Sukol
Bryan Del Rosario
Sidney Hargro
Kari Dunn Saratovsky
Jessica Janssen
David Matthew
Christine Zachai
Fred Dedrick
Rhonda R. Mims
Richard Sussman
Emmett Carson
Van Evans