Heather LordHow One Backpack Can Help Change the World

By: Heather Lord In: 2013 Family Philanthropy Conference

28 Jan 2013

This year’s Council on Foundations Family Philanthropy Conference is challenging those of us in family philanthropy to consider how systems thinking applies to our work. At the opening plenary, David Peter Stroh from Bridgeway Partners defined a system as “an interconnected set of elements organized to achieve something.” In a philanthropic context, systems thinking involves rewiring our minds, organizations, and grantmaking practices to address both the obvious and less obvious aspects of the systems in which we and our grantees operate.

For example, consider the life of a young girl. She could live in the United States or another country. She could live in a rural or urban environment. Now consider all of the forces at play determining whether or not that young girl will grow into a happy, healthy, and productive adult.

Yesterday afternoon Victoria Dunning, vice president for programs at The Global Fund for Children, led a lively session, “Investing in Girls and Women: Innovations and Opportunities for Impact,” about how systems thinking applies to investing in women and girls. She took a school backpack, held it in front of her, and slowly unpacked the objects inside. The 10 objects symbolize things every girl should have in her life:

  1. A water bottle representing access to clean water and healthy living.
  2. A notebook representing education.
  3. A compass whistle representing the ability to map life, mobility, survival,  and safety .
  4. An identity card representing links to her name, her family, her culture, and available resources should she find herself as a refugee or asylum seeker.
  5. A book representing literacy and the chance to learn and dream about the wider world and other possible futures.
  6. A cell phone representing social networks, access to information, and banking.
  7. A purse representing financial literacy and paths to making a living.
  8. Clean underwear, menstrual pads, and tissues supporting her mobility and ability to be an active member of her community.
  9. A condom representing her ability to have control over her sexual life and choices.
  10.  A pocket copy of the Universal Declaration for Human Rights because every girl should know and practice her rights as a human being and active global citizen.

These 10 objects represent some of the forces at play in shaping the lives of young women. They also symbolize the many different ways we as grantmakers can consider investing in women and girls.

Imagine how different the world would look if every girl in the world—the United States included—had tangible access to the resources represented in Victoria’s backpack.

If you don’t (yet) have an explicit investment strategy focused on women and girls, imagine how different the world would look if you took steps to bring an awareness of how your grantmaking—from environmental issues to health issues to economic development issues—directly and indirectly impacts the future for women and girls.

Systems are powerful; they are forged by deep forces. But they are also fragile; if one element is taken away, the whole system changes. The bad news about this paradoxical tension is that an ill-conceived philanthropic investment can bring on an avalanche of negative unintended consequences, sometimes costing livelihoods and lives. The good news is that family philanthropy, at its best and most conscious and informed by diverse perspectives, can also make big differences even with small, well-placed investments.

Here’s to continuing the conversation about the risks and opportunities of systems-level change over the next few days, and the upcoming decades.

Heather Lord is a trustee for the RNR Charitable Foundation.

Comment Form


Welcome to RE: Philanthropy! In this blog, guest and Council bloggers share ideas and insights on the most pressing issues in philanthropy. If you want to contribute, please contact Lana Williams at lana.williams@cof.org.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Council on Foundations.

Contributors

Lana Williams
Laurel Lee-Alexander
Kristen Grimm
Tony Macklin
Heeten Kalan
Susan Price
Anne Sekula
Brenda Chumley
Ed Miller
Mimi Box, Mimi Corcoran Jane Vincent, and Stewart Sarkozy-Banoczy
Priscilla Enriquez
Kisha Green Dimbo
Mayur Patel and Diana Scearce
Michael Durnil
Sue Bornick
Adrienne Vargas
JamesWeinberg
Sarita Venkat
Michael Smith
Heather Bennett
Linda Raybin
Brooke Bailey
Latonya Slack
Katherine Lorenz
Salin Geevarghese
Renee Branch
Carrie Varoquiers
William Vesneski
Mary Topliff
Nancy Berglass
Ken Sternad
Joop Rubens
Ashley Harper
Diane Miller
Daniel Kaufman
Dr. Peter Long
Jerry Hagstrom
Vicki Rosenberg
Leslie Dunford
Niamani Mutima
Ann Cramer
Kaberi Banerjee-Murthy
Dale Robinson Anglin
Chet Hewitt
Margaret Gage
Noel McLaughlin
Daniel Olias Silverman
Lorrie Fair
Ophelia Basgal
Kathryn Merchant